Feeds:
Posts
Comments

OPT Powerbuoy deployed in Hawaii

Ocean Power Technologies, Inc. announcement of deployment of one PowerBuoy wave energy device at the Marine Corps Base at Kaneohe Bay on the island of Oahu, Hawaii.

The announcement continues by saying that the location is “approximately one mile offshore in 100 feet of water” and that it is “generating power in accordance with its specifications for local wave conditions and the test protocol being used” not sure what that means, maybe a military secret… :)

In any case this seems to be a new enhanced PowerBuoy model with “a more efficient power take-off system”, OPT says.

The announcement also mentions on-going collaboration between OPT and the US Navy with more installations in the pipeline.

Reference: OceanPowerMagazine.net

NewEnergyFocus site reports on a Northwest Regional Development Agency (NWDA), Scottish Enterprise and the Nuclear Decommissioning Authority feasibility study for tidal energy in Solway Firth

The report authors identify 9 main options covering a range of technologies (4 barrages, 2 lagoons and 3 tidal reefs) with, obviously, a range of electricity generation capacity (from 88 MW to 5.9 GW) and associated costs.

The nine options identified in the study are:

  • Barrage 1: Workington to Abbey Head – largest barrage scheme with greatest energy output and environmental impact. Scale of construction and capital costs are limiting factors;
  • Barrage 2: Southerness Point to Beckfoot – intermediate barrage, still with substantial environmental impact but offers some compromise;
  • Barrage 3: Bowness to Annan – smaller barrage with reduced capital costs and energy output;
  • Barrage 4: Moricambe Bay – barrage located out of main estuary to reduce environmental imapct. Small empounded area reduces available energy;
  • Lagoon 1: Rascarrel to Southerness – larger lagoon on North side offering localised environmental impact but higher cost of generation than barrage options;
  • Lagoon 2: Maryport to Beckfoot – southern lagoon with lowest energy output of the two options but similar potential environmental benefits;
  • Reef 1: Workington to Abbey Head – largest reef scheme that enables large scale of generation with lower impact than barrage option;
  • Reef 2: Southerness Point to Beckfoot – mid-range solution in terms of energy and environmental impact but improved cost of energy due to lower scale;
  • Reef 3: Bowness to Annan – smallest reef where energy generation is limited by reduced tidal range in the shallow estuary. Potential to offer minimal environmental impact.

Nine options found for utilising tidal resource in Solway Firth

References:

http://www.newenergyfocus.com/do/ecco/view_item?listid=1&listcatid=32&listitemid=3525

http://www.nwda.co.uk/news–events/press-releases/201001/solway-energy-gateway-results.aspx

http://www.solwayenergygateway.co.uk/solway-energy-home.asp

From Carbon Trust press release on feb 2nd:

"Marine energy is currently ten years behind offshore wind energy in its development, but [...] costs can be dramatically reduced over the next ten years, which could see up to a thousand devices operating in the water by 2020. [...] Marine energy will be ready for mass scale deployment and an important new commercial UK industry by 2020"

"[...] Generating electricity from the UK’s powerful wave and tidal resource not only plays a crucial role in meeting our climate change targets but also presents a significant economic opportunity for the UK. Wave alone presents a £2 billion economic opportunity for the UK. [...] Carbon Trust analysis shows that 25% of the world’s wave and tidal technologies are being developed in the UK. Marine energy is an emerging industry with massive growth potential and each successful technology is competing for a stake in what will be a major growth industry.”

Details on Carbon Trust new funding:

" Carbon Trust [...] announces the six most promising technologies that will today receive £22m new funding to speed up the deployment of full scale prototypes of their leading designs. [...]

Designed and managed by the Carbon Trust, the Marine Renewable Proving Fund (MRPF) uses new funding from the Department of Energy and Climate Change (DECC). The MRPF marks a new level of commitment to developing wave and tidal technologies by helping the UK’s most promising technologies to progress towards early stage deployment and accelerating the first commercial projects in UK waters."

And this is what they look like:

clip_image002 Hammerfest Strøm UK 1MW HS-1000 tidal system
Norwegian blade system held in place by ballast, operating in Norway for severl years.Next generation will be deployed at EMEC in 2011.
clip_image002[4] Voith 1MW Tidal Turbine
German company established in hydropower turbine design. Tidal design uses propeller-style blades to drive turbines. 300kW prototype working off Korea.1MW design to be deployed at EMEC in 2011.
Full-scale Oyster® Aquamarine 2.5MW Oyster 2 wave system
Effectively a giant hinge that opens and closes from wave movement. Action drives water pumps that in turn drive turbines on land. Very few moving parts. The 315-kilowatt (kW) Oyster 1 device was officially connected to the National Grid at EMEC in November 2009 and is currently undergoing sea trials to gather data to finalise the Oyster 2 design, which will be deployed as a 2.5-megawatt (MW) pod of three linked devices powering a single onshore hydro-electric generator
Deployment at EMEC in 2011 for commercial deployment planned in 2013
clip_image002[6] Marine Current Turbines 1.2MW SeaGen tidal system
16m twin turbine system attached to central column has been operating in the Bristol channel for several years, and money will take system forward to commercial demonstration.
clip_image002[8] Atlantis AK-1000 1MW Tidal Turbine
Uses 18m bi-directional turbine design with high-efficiency blades. Only moving part in design is central shaft.To be deployed at EMEC in 2011.
clip_image002[10] Pelamis P2 750kW wave system
Characteristic ‘snake’ design generates electricity as articulations between units move. Modular design allows parts to be exchanged easily.Will be deployed at EMEC in the summer of 2010.

References:

http://www.carbontrust.co.uk/news/news/press-centre2010/2010/Pages/marine-energy-ready-for-mass-deployment.aspx

http://www.nce.co.uk/news/energy/uk-to-dominate-in-marine-and-tidal-energy/5213690.article?sm=5213690

http://www.aquamarinepower.com/technologies/

http://www.renewableenergyworld.com/rea/news/article/2010/02/aquamarine-gets-5-1m-to-develop-oyster-2?cmpid=WNL-Friday-February5-2010

From the European Wind Energy Association site:

“In 2009, a total of eight new wind farms consisting of 199 offshore wind turbines, with a combined power generating capacity of 577 MW, were connected to the grid in Europe. This represents a growth rate of 54% compared to the 373 MW installed during 2008. For 2010, the European Wind Energy Association (EWEA) expects the completion of 10 additional European offshore wind farms, adding 1,000 MW and equivalent to market growth of 75% compared to 2009.”

Detail of 2009 new offshore wind installations

“[...] Currently, 17 offshore wind farms are under construction in Europe, totaling more than 3,500 MW, with just under half being constructed in UK waters. In addition, a further 52 offshore wind farms have won full consent in European waters, totaling more than 16,000 MW, with just over half of this capacity planned in Germany.

In 2009, the turnover of the offshore wind industry was approximately €1.5 billion, and EWEA expects this to double in 2010 to approximately €3 billion. 

[...] 

More than 100 GW of projects are at various stages of planning and could provide enough power to meet 10% of European electricity demand. 

Europe is the world leader in offshore wind with 828 wind turbines and a cumulative capacity of 2,056 MW spread across 38 offshore wind farms in nine European countries. The UK and Denmark are the current leaders, with a 44% and 30% share respectively. In 2009, five countries built new offshore wind farms: UK (284 MW), Demark (230 MW), Sweden (30 MW), Germany (30 MW), Norway (2.3 MW).[...]

Reference : EWEA

As the industry is planning to install turbines further offshore, there will be the need of developing new foundations technology; this will be a serious engineering challenge.

Most of the UK Round3 development sites will be in 30m waters or deeper. Current technology cannot really cope with this sort of depth.

Carbon Trust UK is coordinating some effort into this as part of their Offshore Wind Accelleration program. The stated objective is to <find new foundation designs for deeper water 30-45m and 45-60m>.

nce.co.uk suggests that 4 prototypes are currently being trialled

nce.co.uk also lists some of the R&D work done in this area:

<

  • UK consultant Gifford is pioneering a large concrete gravity base structure which will be ferried to site by submersive transport and an installation barge (NCE 26 November 2009).
  • Dutch firm Suction Pile Technology has put forward a self installing foundation solution.
  • US consultant Keystone Engineering is developing a spider-like tripod with three supporting legs angled around a central pile in a twisted jacket.
  • US  marine consultant Glosten Associates has proposed a floating wind turbine which comprises a buoyant hull, tendons and an anchorage system.

>

References:

Carbon Trust, New Civil Engineer nce.co.uk

Announced today (this has been in the pipeline for a while):

Rights granted for 9 new offshore wind developments in UK coastal zone. Overall generating potential: 32 GW.

A very positive step from a government that is now aware that it can’t rely much longer on North Sea oil & gas and consequently looks keen to improve the currently very poor performance of the UK in the renewable energy sector.

And this is key, as the market can deliver only when governments provide the right economical and regulatory environment.

Will these projects be completed in the next 10 years as suggested? Challenging.

And certainly not with the current state of the supply chain (components, infrastructures, support vessels, skills).

The words we hear today from Brown, Miliband and Drayson seem to suggest that they are fully committed to “create a new market”.

Hopefully this won’t be just a short term infatuation to get over the disappointment of the end of this government love story with the financial sector.

And hopefully the new government – whoever will be leading it – after this spring general elections will keep up the support.

Full list of the wind farm licenses from the UK Department of Energy & Climate Change site:

  • Moray Firth Zone, Moray Offshore Renewables Ltd which is 75% owned by EDP Renovaveis and 25% owned by SeaEnergy Renewables – 1.3 GW
  • Firth of Forth Zone, SeaGreen Wind Energy Ltd equally owned by SSE Renewables  and Fluor  – 3.5 GW
  • Dogger Bank Zone, the Forewind Consortium equally owned by each of SSE Renewables, RWE Npower Renewables, Statoil and Statkraft – 9 GW
  • Hornsea Zone, Siemens Project Ventures and Mainstream Renewable Power, a consortium equally owned by Mainstream Renewable Power and Siemens Project Ventures and involving Hochtief Construction – 4 GW
  • Norfolk Bank Zone, East Anglia Offshore Wind Ltd equally owned by Scottish Power Renewables and Vattenfall Vindkraft – 7.2 GW
  • Hastings Zone, Eon Climate and Renewables UK– 0.6 GW
  • West of Isle of Wight Zone, Eneco New Energy – 0.9 GW
  • Bristol Channel  Zone, RWE Npower Renewables, the UK subsidiary of RWE Innogy – 1.5 GW
  • Irish Sea Zone, Centrica Renewable Energy and involving RES Group – 4.2 GW

 Developments locations from the bbc.co.uk site 

More information on the Crown Estate site

Very interesting status on Offshore Wind projects read in RenewableEnergyWorld.com on 09 December 2009 (by E.de Vries)
 
<< Europe is currently the global sector leader and during 2008, 366 MW of new offshore wind capacity was installed, taking the cumulative total to 1471 MW – all built in European waters. Multiple sources quote different expectations for new installation figures for Europe, ranging 430–760 MW in 2009, 1100–1180 MW in 2010, and another 1120–1500 MW in 2011.

Furthermore, EWEA’s scenario report states, cumulative offshore wind capacity in Europe may reach 40 GW by 2020 and 150 GW in 2030. However, despite the importance of a rapid increase in offshore capacity, much more relevant than adding megawatts is a shift in focus towards optimising power generation potential per installed MW for the lowest lifecycle costs. Several examples of leading wind turbine suppliers that have developed dedicated solutions for specific (environmental) circumstances emerged at the European Offshore Wind event.

Among many milestones that have taken place in the wind industry during 2009 was the installation of China’s first 3-MW (rotor diameter 90 metres) Sinovel offshore wind turbine. This first unit of the 100-MW Shanghai Donghai Bridge demonstration project undoubtedly marks the first of many future offshore wind farms to be built along Chinese shores.

Among several future Chinese wind industry players is former Dutch entrant DarWinD, which had just commenced building a 5-MW direct-drive prototype turbine before its June 2009 bankruptcy. Chinese firm Xiangtan Electric Manufacturing Group (XEMC) acquired DarWinD hardware and Intellectual Property (IP). Amongst other things XEMC manufactures generators, control equipment, large castings and forgings. The company already manufactures a 2-MW wind turbine in cooperation with Harokasan of Japan that has owned the direct drive technology from former Dutch group Zephyros since 2005.

DarWinD’s turbine concept also builds on Zephyros wind technology. Company sources say that the renamed XEMC DarWinD plans to erect a land prototype in the Netherlands and an offshore prototype in China.

US Offshore Wind

Recent reports from the USA refer to about 37 offshore wind projects that are ‘in the works’. A further prediction is that within the next five years the first U.S. offshore wind project will come on line.

Through its ScanWind purchase in September (see REW September–October 2009), GE can potentially become a major player in the emerging US offshore market, even though the initial focus is on the European sector, according to comments made by GE’s vice president of renewables, Victor Abate.

With regard to further ScanWind technology development, Abate explicitly referred to his company’s workhorse strategy, which is based upon producing large quantities of a limited range of products: ‘When we acquired Enron Wind in 2002, about 1000 1.5-MW turbines were operational. Today total numbers in operation worldwide exceed the 12,000 mark. The Arklow Bank offshore project served as a learning platform for us and we are excited about ScanWind direct drive technology in terms of proven reliability. At the moment availability of their turbines is already 96%–97%, achieved by operation under harsh Norwegian coastal conditions.’

According to the company, next year GE’s offshore turbine will be offered to the market, with first deliveries planned for 2012–2013. However, Abate did not make any specific mention of major product parameters such as the product power rating and rotor size.

Perhaps unsurprisingly, the long-delayed German offshore wind market kick-off – and many projects being in deep water locations far from shore – coincides with a steadily expanding market entry role for ‘super class’ 5–6 MW installations. The fact that Areva Multibrid and REpower will each erect six of their 5-MW turbine models in German waters this year can be regarded as another genuine milestone in offshore wind development.

This year a third German supplier, BARD Engineering, plans to begin installation of 80 Tripile foundations for its 400-MW BARD Offshore I North Sea project, in many respects a huge challenge. The Areva Multibrid and REpower 5-MW prototypes were erected in 2004, while the BARD prototype installation followed three years later.

Second Generation

REpower took 2–2.5 years to complete its second-generation 6.15-MW 6M, an up-scaling development of the 5M offshore turbine, now a serial product, with its initial capacity of 5 MW. The 126-metre rotor diameter remained unchanged and earlier this year the company erected three 6M onshore prototypes. Novelties associated with the design include a new 6.6 kV water-cooled generator (previously 950 kV) and a newly designed gearbox, with a 20% higher torque rating but a similar component mass when compared with the 5M.

Furthermore, the 6M’s frequency converter system features three modules, which as a redundancy measure enables continued operation at a reduced output of 67% in the event that one module fails. REpower says that the 6M yields 10% more energy compared to the 5M at sites with an average wind speed of 10 m/s (using LM 61.5 metre P blades), and will become available for offshore projects from 2012. In future the 6M will be delivered with in-house developed and manufactured RE 61.5 metre blades.

BARD Engineering focuses on high-wind offshore applications and has announced plans to erect two different prototype versions of its second-generation 6.5-MW BARD 6.5, with an unchanged 122-metre rotor diameter, in 2010. One version comprises a hydrodynamic WinDrive system from Voith that enables variable speed wind turbine operation combined with a directly grid-connected fixed speed generator, eliminating the need for a power converter. A second version will be fitted with a ‘conventional’ mechanical drive system (for more on this development see REW July–August 2009).

The most powerful turbine on the market currently is Enercon’s E-126 machine. This IEC Wind Class 1A direct drive turbine (with a rotor diameter of 127 metres) is now rated at 7.5 MW (previously 6 MW), but is not currently available for the near shore and offshore wind market.

Meanwhile, two novel offshore wind turbine development projects have come from the Netherlands. Emerging player in the sector 2-BEnergy is developing a 6-MW two-bladed turbine concept with a 130-metre rotor diameter and with prototype erection envisaged for early 2011.

The turbine will be fitted with a conventional geared drivetrain system, while downwind or upwind rotor configurations are both being evaluated as potential options, said company spokesperson Herbert Peels this September. A genuine offshore wind industry novelty is that the nacelle is mounted on a so-called ‘full truss’ support structure. This arrangement eliminates the traditional ‘tower plus foundation’ solution as, instead, an integrated single assembly extends from the seabed to the yaw bearing below the nacelle.

Denoted as the Delft Offshore Turbine (DOT), a second Dutch research and development project that commenced in 2008 is pursuing a radical step away from incremental offshore wind turbine development. Aimed at designing ‘the ultimate offshore turbine’, a key goal of the project is to drastically reduce the number of key components compared to ‘conventional’ state-of-the-art wind turbines currently applied offshore.

The DOT concept consists of a two-blade, fixed-pitch 5–10 MW wind turbine arrangement that directly drives a ‘closed loop’ water displacement pump located in the nacelle. High-pressure water flow generated by this pump drives a submerged hydraulic motor coupled to a second pump. That component in turn is part of an ‘open loop’ high-pressure seawater-based circuit. High-pressure seawater flow from individual wind farm turbines is then channelled to a central Offshore High Voltage Station (OHVS) where multiple hydro-generators convert the hydraulic power into electrical power of the required voltage level.

Delft researchers view power conversion into electricity at centralized level as a substantial system simplification and a major advantage compared to the current state-of-the-art solution in which electrical power conversion is executed at wind turbine level. In an approach analogous to ‘conventional’ offshore wind farms electrical power from the OHVS is finally fed to the onshore high-voltage network.

According to an ambitious programme, DOT technology will be ready for commercial applications as a package within the second half of the next decade.

Elsewhere, UK-based wind industry newcomer VertAx Wind Ltd revealed plans to develop a novel 10-MW three-blade vertical-axis offshore wind turbine it expects to enter the home wind market commercially by 2014. Its massive H-shaped stall-type Darrieus rotor is expected to reach 140 metres in diameter, while the blade length is 110 metres. The turbine will further be fitted with twin 5-MW direct driven generators made by Converteam, each located at a different elevation level. A major feature supporting operations and maintenance is a helicopter-landing platform integrated within the tower’s top section.

The company’s overall objective is to substantially reduce the cost of offshore wind power generation by offering installations boasting the fewest number of moving parts currently known in industry. The required total development budget, including a completed prototype, is estimated at about £35 million (€40 million).

In a more advanced product development phase than either DOT or VertAx is the 10-MW Clipper C-150 Britannia offshore turbine development, taking place in Blyth, in the UK. This giant will be fitted with in-house developed 71.5-metre rotor blades resulting in a record 150-metre rotor diameter, and the design is to be certified for a 30-year life.

As with the 2.5-MW Liberty turbine, this new machine also features a geared distributed drive system with four generators. And, according to Clipper Windpower Marine Limited managing director David Still, the total number of drive system components has not increased, despite a much larger total gear ratio (i.e. rotor speed 6.05–11.5 RPM). Still explained, ‘Another major benefit of the drive system choice is that the turbine can continue operations with one or more generators removed until replacement is performed.’

He further clarified confusion that has arisen over the C-150 power rating, saying that the land prototype will generate a maximum of 7.5 MW. The 10-MW offshore version will ‘simply’ spin a lot faster. Also remarkable is that the increase in the turbine’s Top Head Mass (THM) – nacelle + rotor – associated with the increased output (2.5 => 10 MW) will not be cubed but linear. Elaborating on product specifications Still said: ‘The C-150’s THM will be in line with the figure of state-of-the-art conventional 5–6 MW turbines, [Editors's note: state-of-the-art is about 350–460 tonnes] that in turn provides the right preconditions to our overall strategy of achieving a 50% reduction in installed costs per MW, and a further 30% reduction in foundation costs per MW.

With regard to component mass, individual 2.6-MW Britannia generators are, for instance, only about 20% heavier compared to their 0.66-MW Liberty equivalents.’ He added that this favorable figure can partly be attributed to a switch from 1320 V DC to a 3600 V AC, which requires less copper. A second major contributing factor to mass reduction is the fact that, according to Clipper technical specifications, Britannia generators turn about twice as fast when compared with the Liberty machine’s generators, rated at 2270 versus 1133 RPM, respectively. Testing the turbine’s subassemblies commenced in 2009 and will continue through 2010, with full drivetrain and blade testing scheduled in early 2011. Clipper plans to erect the onshore prototype by the end of 2011.

Offshore Workhorse

Siemens Energy released a second-generation 3.6-MW offshore wind turbine featuring a 120-metre rotor diameter. The new model’s power to swept area ratio (P/A) is only 0.32, a value that until recently was usually restricted to onshore turbines operating in low and medium wind speed conditions. Technologically the SWT-3.6-120 is based upon the proven SWT-3.6-107 (prototype erected in 2004) that has developed into the offshore wind industry workhorse over the last few years. For example, the world’s biggest offshore project so far, Greater Gabbard, will comprise 140 of the SWT-3.6-107 turbines when completed, planned for commissioning in May 2011.

‘We anticipate that our SWT-3.6-120 will generate roughly 10% more electricity at a typical offshore site compared to the SWT-3.6-107’, commented Siemens Wind Power CEO Andreas Nauen on the new product’s potential. Siemens has already installed 100 of its 3.6 MW turbines with another 700 units on order and earlier this year Dong Energy signed orders for over 450 SWT-3.6-120 machines.

Since 1995, Vestas Wind Systems of Denmark has installed over 400 offshore wind turbines with a total capacity exceeding 900 MW. In recent years the company has lost market share to Siemens, but aims to recapture it with a new V112-3.0 MW offshore model. According to the company, the new flagship turbine delivers optimal output in average wind speeds up to 9.5 m/s and will be individually IECS class certified for each separate offshore project.

V112-3.0 MW Offshore marketing will commence immediately. Vestas will install two V112-3.0 MW prototypes onshore in January and mostly likely April 2010 followed by serial delivery in 2011, a company spokesperson stated. Unlike the lightweight V90-3.0 MW turbine applied in several offshore wind farms, the new flagship features a conventional non-integrated geared drive system and, in a novelty for Vestas, a permanent magnet-type synchronous generator.

In addition, on 27 October Vestas partially lifted the curtain on a new 6-MW offshore turbine with a 130–140 metre rotor diameter that it is working on. Other technical specifications and envisaged market introduction time scale details have not been made available yet, but according to well-informed wind industry sources it will be a direct drive turbine fitted with a Vestas-designed annular generator.

Finally, Vestas has joined a research programme with Nowitech of Norway on the development of floating foundations suitable for water depths of more than 30 metres.

Downwind Floating Turbine Cooperation

Earlier this year French nuclear engineering giant Areva acquired German rotor blade manufacturer PN Rotor GmbH. The latter company was owned by Prokon Nord Energiesysteme GmbH and supplied all rotor blades for Multibrid M5000 turbines. Prokon is an Areva Multibrid minority shareholder with a 49% stake and also built and operates a foundry for M5000 main castings.

In a separate development, Areva and Norwegian renewable energy company SWAY AS announced a cooperation deal in August aimed at offering new solutions for exploiting offshore wind power in deep water. Areva Multibrid will adapt its 5-MW M5000 wind turbine, which was specifically designed for offshore applications, to enable downwind operation on SWAY’s new tower solution.

‘Our aim is to demonstrate that deep-water wind power is commercially attractive within the next four years’, said SWAY founder and CEO Eystein Borgen earlier this year.

SWAY has been granted a licence from the Norwegian Water Resources and Energy Directorate to build a floating offshore wind turbine approximately 7 km off Karmøy on the country’s west coast. Prototype construction is conditional on support from the recently established Norwegian financial support programme for marine renewable energy (Enova).

Finding a customer for this project is nonetheless essential and when that key hurdle is overcome the wind turbine may be up and running in 18-24 months, according to an optimistic Borgen, who said: ‘Our ambition is to demonstrate that such plants in a commercial phase shall be able to supply power at a price competitive with shallow water wind parks.’

The demonstration plant features a 188-metre tower structure, of which 104 metres is submerged. The ballasted tower bottom is anchored to the seabed with the aid of tension leg technology, including a suction anchor. A genuine novelty is a subsea yaw mechanism located between the tension leg and the tower plus wind turbine assembly. The downwind rotor allows the floating tower to tilt (6-8 degrees) due to wind pressure (thrust), and is claimed to be acceptable in terms of yield loss. Transformers and power electronics will be located in the tower, and a subsea cable will connect the plant to the onshore electrical grid.

All-Weather Access

One of the many specific challenges linked to offshore wind power is all-weather installation access. A combination of turbine failure and being unable to access the machine during adverse weather conditions can easily result in extended downtime and subsequent loss of revenue. A common transfer access method to offshore wind turbines on fixed foundations is with the aid of a ‘people mover’ or other service vessel. The rubber-lined bow section is steered firmly against a ‘matching’ steel structure that is often an integral add-on part of the substructure/foundation. Engaging full throttle on the vessel introduces increased friction between it and the corresponding steel structure and slows down wave movements to such an extent that it affords relative safe passage to service personnel.

Among alternative, novel, access technologies is the Ampelmann, developed by Dutch researchers at the TU Delft. The vessel-based self-stabilizing platform actively compensates for all ship motion. Ampelmann systems are already employed in the North Sea and elsewhere and they are claimed to reduce the necessity for jack-ups, semi-subs and helicopters, potentially turning it into a cost effective system, even under marginal weather conditions.

In comparison, according to an expert delegate, floating offshore wind turbine access from a vessel represents a much bigger challenge as waves and wind cause both objects to move continuously. Another challenge may prove to be conducting servicing activities, including the exchange of large and small components (like circuit boards) alike while the entire structure continuously moves in all directions.

The Future’s Out There

During 1991 former technology pioneer Bonus of Denmark (now owned by Siemens) erected the world’s first offshore wind farm comprising of 11 of its 450-kW fixed-speed stall regulated turbines in shallow water at Vindeby. Since then wind turbine size and complexity, average offshore wind farm capacity, distance to shore and water depth have all grown dramatically. Despite the challenges such changes have inevitably wrought, a steadily increasing number of international players continues to reinforce the rapidly expanding wind industry base.

Meanwhile, highly experienced offshore wind market entrants complement established parties with new spirit, fresh ideas and, perhaps most importantly, a strong belief in what they individually and as partners can accomplish. Accelerated availability of reliable high-performance wind technology, fast vessels and clever installation methods, all-weather access technologies, well-trained specialists, and sufficient finance are all essential preconditions for meeting Europe’s ambitious offshore wind objectives.

Equally important for streamlining and speeding up projects and processes is a facilitating role at national and EU political level, with committed leaders taking the responsibility to act. The idea that a winning combination of ambitious renewables (including wind power) and environmental targets can also create many well paid long-term green careers is also fortunately gaining ground. In this respect Swedish deputy prime minister & minister of Enterprise and Energy, Maud Olofsson, deserves much praise. During the conference opening session she inspired the audience by voicing these much needed views and visions.

 Eize de Vries is a wind technology correspondent for Renewable Energy World Magazine.


Sidebar: New Products

Offshore wind farms could not function without subsea cables transporting the electrical power to shore for feeding into the high-voltage network. Currently four large cable suppliers dominate the world market, including ABB, Prysmian (formerly Pirelli), Nexus, and Draka. The latter has manufactured electricity transport cables for 100 years, including 30 years of subsea cables. The company’s commercial director of subsea cables, Martin Dale, explained: ‘In past years Draka made a large investment in our Norway plant capable aimed at producing a new generation (up to) XLPE 36 kV AC medium voltage cables for the offshore wind market. [Editor's note: Such cables typically extend from the offshore high voltage station (OHVS) – where the cumulative wind farm power output is brought together and transformed to the required voltage level – to shore.]

Draka has now expanded 36-kV AC cable production and in addition offers a complete range of accessories and installation services along with circuit testing or commissioning. We in fact offer a complete solution from design through installation that helps make project management and field installation for our customers more efficient than trying to coordinate several vendors and installers.’

Commenting on dedicated product features Dale says that a lot of effort was put into making the XLPE series more flexible when compared with state-of-the-art equivalents. A second built-in product feature he mentioned explicitly is an extra protective layer aimed at enhancing long-term marine performance.

Hyundai Heavy Industries of South Korea is one of the world’s largest shipbuilders that also manufactures products like power plants, substations, diesel generator sets, electric motors and generators. Hyundai’s renewable energy products portfolio has now been expanded with the addition of wind turbines, and already encompasses solar modules and inverters, and electrical components for electric vehicles. Two sister wind turbine designs, the 1.65-MW HQ 1650 and the 2-MW HQ 2000, originate from Windtec. A third product, a 2.5-MW direct drive turbine originates from market entrant Atlantis. Manufacture of both HQ models commenced in September 2009, while production start of the direct drive turbine is planned for next year.


Sidebar: Shipping: Evolution or Revolution?

Current installation barges and self-propelled vessels can be roughly subdivided into jack-up type and floating state-of-the-art solutions; evolutionary new developments; and, innovative concepts, each with strong supporters and stern critics.

GeoSea of Belgium is part of the DEME group of companies. This August the company commissioned a new ‘traditional’ four-legged Jack-up barge Goliath, with a length of 55.5 metres and a beam of 32.2 metres. Her deck can be fitted with cranes up to 1200 tonnes capacity and the barge will be employed for the first time installing foundations and wind turbines for the 50 turbine Walney project in the UK in 2010.

Self Propelled

UK-based SeaJacks is originally an oil and gas-focused marine company that recently made the switch to renewables. It now owns two newly built 76 metre long and 36 metre wide self-propelled jack-up sister vessels, Kraken and Leviathan that were commissioned in 2009. The vessels are a design by Dutch marine engineering specialist GustoMSC, and are characterised by four huge triangular truss-type legs and a 300 tonne crane. The vessels have already been contracted until Q3/Q4 of 2011.

German companies Hochtief Construction AG and Beluga Shipping GmbH joined forces by founding Beluga Hochtief Offshore. The partners plan to build a fleet of special vessels capable of building, operating and maintaining offshore wind power plants. This next generation heavy-lift self-propelled jack-up vessel is planned to enter active service by 2012 and can sail at 12 knots. The vessels comprise four lattice-type legs for working in water depths of up to 50 metres. A 1700 tonne crane is fitted around one of the legs. Main hull dimensions are a massive 135 metre length and a 40 metre beam with accommodation facilities for up to 160 persons, including crew. The 8000 tonne cargo load is sufficient to stow eight turbines in the 5 MW+ class.

Floating Innovation

Huisman is a Dutch heavy-lift, drilling and subsea solutions specialist company which is active worldwide. The company has developed an innovative, fast (14 knots), floating Wind Turbine Shuttle concept for installing complete wind turbines. The design is squarely aimed at substantially speeding up offshore installation activities and since the vessel is not jacked up out of the water during installation activities, workability is not limited by this time-consuming operation.

Sharing the characteristics of a SWATH (Small Water plane Area Twin Hull) type vessel, there are two large submerged submarine hull shape pontoons. Each is attached to rather small vertical support columns on top and a deck box located above water. A clever feature is that as soon as the shuttle sails out of the harbour, draft is adjusted and the pontoons become fully submerged, a measure aimed at minimising vessel motion. The floating vessel is expected to be capable of the transport and installation of two complete 5 MW-scale wind turbine top heads of up to 1400 tonnes each in a single operation. An alternative configuration could see the transport and installation of two monopiles, jackets or other substructures/foundations. In the case of jackets, a smaller more cost-effective vessel can perform the pile ramming. Another potential application is offshore turbine exchange. Capable of installing wind turbines up to maximum significant wave height of 3.5 metres, corresponding to an annual workability of approximately 80% under North Sea weather conditions, various technologies are employed to keep a wind turbine virtually stationary in relation to a matching fixed foundation during the lowering process. One specific measure is active heave compensation employed to (further) minimize vessel heave motion, a known and infamous floating wind turbine installation bottleneck. Huisman also designs and manufactures cranes with capacities of 300–1700 tonnes which are used in various wind turbine installation vessels. >>

a useful review of current (December 2009) wave and tidal projects in hydroworld.com

< Proponents of wave and tidal power have compared the state of this area of the renewable energy sector with the early days of wind power. The technology has great potential but still must prove itself before it can be widely deployed.

Wave energy technology uses the movement of ocean waves to generate electricity from turbines. Wave power differs from tidal power, which is based on extracting energy from tidal movements and the water currents that accompany their rise and fall.

Experts estimate tidal energy’s advantage lies in its predictability. Wave energy could be more abundant than tidal energy while still being less intermittent than wind or solar power.

Conditions along coastlines or on the ocean surface, however, can be hard on wave and tidal installations. Generation assets must be built with operational hazards such as crashing waves, corrosive salt water and other dangers in mind.

Potential
According to the European Marine Energy Centre (EMEC) at Scotland’s Orkney Islands, the best wave climates—with yearly average power levels between 20-70 kW/m of wave front or higher—are where strong storms occur. The extent to which this will prove practical to harness, however, will depend upon the successful development of near-shore and deep-water technologies.

The most energetic wave resources are along the coasts of the Americas, Europe, Southern Africa, Australia and New Zealand.

The EMEC is one of the world’s foremost proving grounds for wave and tidal technologies and has collected more than 100 wave energy concepts, with many still at the research and development stage.

Wave and tidal technologies can be three to four times more expensive than wind power per megawatt, so many installations were developed and supported with government financial backing.

The United Kingdom remains one of the largest state sponsors of wave and tidal power. The U.K. government granted $3.8 million from an $83 million pot created under the Marine Renewables Deployment Fund, which began in 2004.

More than $33 million has been earmarked for a new Marine Renewables Proving Fund with a further $15.7 million going to develop a Wave Hub off Cornwall and $13.2 million for the EMEC.

Setbacks
Scottish firm Pelamis Wave Power, which changed its name in 2007 from Ocean Power Delivery, launched a project in Portugal called the Agucadoura wave farm. The project consisted of three of the company’s P1-A Marine Energy Converters.

In September 2008, the company installed the energy converters 3 miles off the coast of northern Portugal. In mid-November 2008, all units were removed from the ocean when leaks were discovered in the buoyancy tanks.

Compounding Agucadoura’s woes, Pelamis couldn’t get the financial support to re-launch the units after the technical problems were solved. Following the global economic downturn, sponsor Babcock & Brown withdrew from the project.

By March 2009, Agucadoura was taken offline indefinitely with about $13 million spent on the project.

In February, Pelamis won an order from British renewable company E.ON for the next generation of Pelamis Marine Energy Converters, which the company calls the P-2. The machine will be built at PWP’s facility at Leith Docks, Edinburgh, and tested at the EMEC at Scotland’s Orkney Islands.

Projects
Despite the cancelation and scaling back of some projects following the economic crisis, there are still wave and tidal projects taking shape.

In November, Ocean Power Technologies (OPT) won a $61 million grant from the Australian government for a utility-scale project. The company said work on the 19-MW project is expected to begin by the second quarter of 2010. Further funding will be needed to complete the project, the company said.

OPT’s PowerBuoy floats freely with the rising and falling of offshore waves. The resulting motion is converted with a power take-off to drive a generator. The generated power is transmitted ashore via an underwater power cable.

A 10-MW OPT power station would occupy about 30 acres of ocean space. The technology is scalable up to 100 MW, the company said.

In 2008, OPT won a $2-million award from the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) in support of OPT’s wave power project in Reedsport, Ore. Major portions of the PB150 PowerBuoy will be fabricated and integrated in Oregon. This was the first award for the building of ocean wave energy systems by the DOE, according to the company.

OPT also has worked with the U.S. Navy on its Deep Water Acoustic Distribution System program. The company is supplying its PowerBuoy technology to the project, which is designed to demonstrate the potential of powering sensor networks over wide areas of the ocean.

Irish tidal energy company OpenHydro won a grant of nearly $3 million in October from Sustainable Energy Ireland’s Ocean Energy Prototype Research and Development Programme. The grant will be used to design and develop a 16-meter Open Center Turbine, Subsea Base and Installation Barge.

The turbine is mounted on the seabed below the ocean waves. Invisible from the surface and silent, the turbines generate up to 1 MW of electricity.

Also in 2009, OpenHydro paired with Nova Scotia Power to unveil a 1-MW tidal turbine to be deployed in the Bay of Fundy. The project will serve as part of Nova Scotia’s tidal power test facility. The Open Center Turbine was manufactured in Ireland by OpenHydro. The turbine will rest directly on the ocean floor using a subsea gravity base fabricated by Cherubini Metal Works.

Oysters and Limpets
Aquamarine Power is a wave energy company whose Oyster Wave Energy Converter has been tested and deployed at the New and Renewable Energy Centre near Newcastle, England.

Oyster is an onshore, commercial-scale pumping cylinder that can deliver more than 170 kW of electricity per unit. A full-scale Oyster uses two pumping cylinders and can deliver in excess of its modeled output of 350 kW.

Oyster is designed to capture the energy found in near-shore waves up to depths of 10 to 12 meters. The device combines new technologies with a hydroelectric power generation system. A commercial farm of just Oyster devices (15 MW) could provide clean renewable energy to 9,000 homes. Aquamarine tested the Oyster in summer 2009 at the EMEC. The company also has an agreement with Airtricity, the renewable energy division of Scottish and Southern Energy, to develop sites capable of hosting 1,000 MW of marine energy by 2020 suitable for deployment of Oyster.

Wavegen, a unit of Voith Hydro with its headquarters in Inverness, Scotland, produces a shoreline wave energy conversion unit called Limpet. The technology is in use and has been connected to Scotland’s power grid since 2000.

The technology used is called an oscillating water column. Ocean waves move air in and out of chambers in a breakwater, which in turn drives Wavegen’s turbine, known as the Wells turbine, to generate electricity.

The 18.5-kW modules are meant for use in breakwaters, coastal defenses, land reclamation schemes and harbor walls.

Wavegen teamed up with Npower Renewables in 2006 to plan a wave power plant for the Scottish island Lewis. The Siadar Wave Energy Project earned the approval of the Scottish government in January.

The project will harness power from the Atlantic waves in Siadar Bay to generate up to 4 MW of electricity. The energy produced each year could supply the average annual electricity needs of about 1,500 homes in the Western Isles.

This article was reprinted from Electric Light and Power’s December 2009 issue >

Dynamic Tidal Power concept

Seen on tidaltoday

<a ‘third way’ to exploit tides, next to both well known methods of ‘Closed Basin’ and ‘Free Stream’. It is called Dynamic Tidal Power (DTP) by its inventors, H2iD, who are based in Emmeloord, The Netherlands.> 

also described in IEA-OES 

 <a very long artificial T-shaped dam perpendicular to the Dutch coast and to the tidal flow. The existence of such dam in a tidal flow creates a hydraulic head over the two sides which can be used to drive conventional low-head hydro turbines mounted in the dam. In a tandem array (i.e., two dams) with proper spacing with respect to the tidal wave, the hydraulic head of both T-dams combined could yield a virtually constant power when producing into the same grid> 

<A pilot project to test the required low-head turbines is planned to start 2009 in one of the dikes of the Delta Project (Grevelingen Dam). The feasibility of a pilot project for a large T-dam in China has recently been considered>

read on RenewableEnergyWorld.com

Joint venture to develop Pelamis style wave farm by Shetland Islands:

Vattenfall and Pelamis Wave Power form the firm Aegir Wave Power Ltd.

<Aegir Wave Power’s project could achieve an installed capacity of up to 20 MW by 2014, and it can be expected to surpass that capacity, Vattenfall said.>

<The Shetland project could include a couple dozen or more Pelamis P-2 wave devices, Scottish media reported. >

<Vattenfall’s ambition is for wave power projects to grow to the scale of offshore wind projects, with the Aegir project becoming a stepping stone to that ambition.>

Also read on shetlandmarine.com

<Aegir would not have been possible without the prospect of a 600MW sub sea cable being built to export the electricity generated by the wind farm, should it receive planning permission>

Older Posts »